Question caused by P’quaint!: Do you agree with the observation that “Love does not consist in gazing at each other, but in looking outward?
in the same direction”?!?
What if you both gaze in the same direction but see/think of different things? Is it still Love?
For instance, you both look at a lovely cool water spring in a beautiful valley in a romantic setting and when your husband opens his mouth you expect to hear sweet nothings befitting the mood…and he very slowly asks, “do you know with the help of radiotracers you can find out the exact source of water of this spring?” and proceeds to enlighten you….
What would then keep you from jumping off the cliff….grrrr?
Any words of enlightenment are welcome 
That may be facts about Do you agree with the observation that “Love does not consist in gazing at each other, but in looking outward? that you could be requirement to clear up problems without any help. With some luck , this will help to in lots of ways; and make your own life much better. Needing facts about Do you agree with the observation that “Love does not consist in gazing at each other, but in looking outward? is likely to be the very best over the years.
Solution:
Answer by Milton
I don’t agree with the basic premise. Neither activity would lead to a mutual understanding needed upon which to build love which is more than chemistry. There is mutual respect. Cooperation, communication, compromise. All go into the formula for “real” love as opposed to “true” love. True love is more visceral and real love is a combination of visceral and intellectual and lasts long after true love has burned to ashes in its intensity but lack of reason.
Answer by udaya k
All Human beings think differently. Meaning of Love is Unique to each individual. There is only an undefinable common factor which differs according to level of consciousness but at emotional level has a common denominator which is the feeling of Love.
Answer by Silverthorn
To find and answer to a problem or a question reductionism is the best method I have found. seek the source and work back outward. The question essentialy is what is the definition of love. If one does not know the answer to that question then no other question about love can be answered reliably.
what is love. find the source. what is its source the well from which emotion springs. love is an emotion. so the source is emotion. until we can identify and understand emotion we can not define love. you are dealing with a symptom. you need the source.
I believe this is why no one has ever answered the question what is love. it can not be answered until the first question is answered what is emotion. how does it work. how is it controled. How does it interact with the rational, with the mind. the genes. the spirit for lack of a better term.
I am inclined to believe the reason we cant figure out what emotions are, is because we lack the sensory capability do detect all aspects of emotional energy. Just as we can not see in the infra red. We see or detect consciously only part of the thing we call emotion. That is why we can not define it. and by extension can not define love. If you think about it we cant define hate either, or even fear.
an opinion
SILVERTHORN
The more I think about it, your question seems to address compatibiliy issues more so than love. Love or strong feeling can resolve issues arising from a lack of compatibility. The smell of a mates feet if bad is only intolerable if the smell exceeds your level of love or feeling for that person. Love or like is the lubricant that makes it possible for people to put up with each other. If your love is strong enough it wont bother you much if he talks about football, the water or his dirty underwear. It just does not matter much when you love some one. all that matters is that you are with them.
Answer by adagio58
Human love is not about admiring the spring water but about valuing the qualities of your loved one, knowing how you complement (complete) each other and help one another along throughout your life together – a “helpmate” and “soul companion”, in other words. It’s a delicate balance to meet the needs of both.
A wife must learn not to be a “clinging vine” type, too dependent on her mate all the time. And he must learn to consider your thoughts and feelings too such as when he might want to move and relocate for job reasons but it upsets the lives of his family. These things must be worked out with quiet understanding, it’s a bit of give and take as you adjust to each other.
One thing to remember, your mate might not always give you flowers on special occasions, being forgetful most of the time, well, if he’s lacking in this regard just be thankful that he does come home to you each day and is happy to spend his time with you and no one else.
If you feel strongly about romancing then let him know how important it is to you. Husbands can be trained, you know, just like adorable puppies! … hehe.
Answer by plıɥɔǝʌol
I think we should do both simultaneously, and with one another’s eyes as well as our own- and then double check it all. If you still are full of love, it is well rooted and you can build upon the foundations
Answer by Dream Out Loud
Hehe. I think it depends how deep the love is. If you can listen to that sort of thing peacefully and calmly even sometimes, then it’s love. People are different in character so I guess they’re gonna gaze at a lake and see things differently. I tried to have an interest in motorbikes for my ex – tried to learn the names of the various brands, tried to stop myself coming out with comments like “to me, that’s a computer virus protector. I can do it for my friends – take an interest by reading her book or trying to gain knowledge of rugby. So I find it far easier to gain an excitement about vintage clothing and sign language, but if that’s not what they are into…
I end up just seeing it as an opportunity to learn, to learn something new about something out of my comfort zone. Providing they are just as willing to take my interests/passions to heart, it doesn’t matter.
Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.
Love never fails.
Answer by Psyengine
Love is expressed in action towards the loved.
Answer by PANDORA Πανδώρα
Sorry…but I’m right out of love now,
and despite both of us looking and seeing the same things,
the interpretations are sadly completely different…
Answer by Pocket Protecktor
The way I love is the best way…
Hot-taw.
(blush)
Answer by ʇǝdɯnɹʇs ǝuıɹʇs
Shove a sandwich in his gob.
You’re welcome.
Answer by † Faith in Flower †
That’s pretty funny, actually!!
Sure it’s still love if it looks outwards! Besides, who WOULDN”T want to use the help of radiotracers to determine the source of a spring? Sounds kinda cool, if you ask me!!
Have any idea much better?
Add your very own answer to the comments!
NCGV and Helpmate of Buncombe County worked together to produce this public service announcement on surviving domestic violence and getting help. For more in…
First, the observations in looking outward in love with each other to configure does not “Do you agree?
No comments:
Post a Comment